Boatright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boatright v. State

213 So. 2d 622

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 1968

DocketNo. K-327

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 So. 2d 622 (Boatright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boatright v. State, 213 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of an order rendered by the trial court denying them bail pending the appeal of their judgments of conviction and sentence. Appellants contend that the order appealed is premised upon the apprehension of the trial court that if bail is granted they will commit further criminal offenses during the pend-ency of their appeal. Appellants contend that this is not a valid ground for denying their motion for an order allowing them bail until their appeal is finally determined. The order appealed is affirmed. See Sanders v. State, (Fla.App.1966) 184 So.2d 686; Younghans v. State, (Fla.1956) 90 So.2d 308; Carbo v. United States, 82 S.Ct. 662, 7 L.Ed.2d 769; United States v. Piper, (D.C.Tex.1964) 227 F.Supp. 735. Contra, see Waller v. State, (Fla.App.1968) 208 So.2d 147.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of an order rendered by the trial court denying them bail pending the appeal of their judgments of conviction and sentence. Appellants contend that the order appealed is premised upon the apprehension of the trial court that if bail is granted they will commit further criminal offenses during the pend-ency of their appeal. Appellants contend that this is not a valid ground for denying their motion for an order allowing them bail until their appeal is finally determined. The order appealed is affirmed. See Sanders v. State, (Fla.App.1966) 184 So.2d 686; Younghans v. State, (Fla.1956) 90 So.2d 308; Carbo v. United States, 82 S.Ct. 662, 7 L.Ed.2d 769; United States v. Piper, (D.C.Tex.1964) 227 F.Supp. 735. Contra, see Waller v. State, (Fla.App.1968) 208 So.2d 147.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 So. 2d 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatright-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack