Boatmen's Savings Bank v. Grewe

84 Mo. 477
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 84 Mo. 477 (Boatmen's Savings Bank v. Grewe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boatmen's Savings Bank v. Grewe, 84 Mo. 477 (Mo. 1884).

Opinion

Brack, J.

This appeal was argued and submitted with the case of Gitchell v. Kreidler, ante, 472. The questions common to them both were considered in that case. The note secured by the deed of trust in this case, was assigned to the respondent more than one year before the tax suit was commenced. The trustee and the payees were made defendants but the respondent was not. It is well settled law that the assignment of the note carries the security. The assignee stands in the place of the payee. Neither the trustee nor the assignor can alone enter satisfaction of the mortgage debt. Generally the assignee is a necessary party to all proceedings affecting his security, in order to be bound thereby. No reason is perceived why there should be any exception made in this class of cases. He is no more affected by the tax suit judgment than the payee would have been, had there been no assignment and the payee had not been made a party to the suit.

The court in which that judgment was entered allowed the sheriff to amend his return to the special execution, so as to show a sale of the property to parties [479]*479other than those disclosed by the original return, but to the same persons to whom deeds had been made. It was entirely competent for the court, upon a proper •showing, to allow the amendment to be made. It is no objection that the amendment was made after this suit was commenced. Blaisdell v. Steamboat Wm. Pope, 19 Mo. 158; Corby v. Burns, 36 Mo. 195; Webster v. Blount, 39 Mo. 500.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and that of the circuit court is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards Land Timber Company v. Richards
163 S.W.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1942)
Meyer v. Ritter
268 F. 937 (Eighth Circuit, 1920)
Hower v. Erwin
119 S.W. 951 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Monett State Bank v. Eubanks
101 S.W. 687 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Martin v. Castle
81 S.W. 426 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
Landau v. Cottrill
60 S.W. 64 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Crawford v. Aultman & Co.
40 S.W. 952 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Cassidy Bros. Commission v. Estep
63 Mo. App. 540 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Lord v. Schamloeffel
50 Mo. App. 360 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Blevins v. Smith
104 Mo. 583 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Giraldin v. Howard
103 Mo. 40 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
Boatmen's Savings Bank v. Grewe
101 Mo. 625 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
Hagerman v. Sutton
91 Mo. 519 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Mo. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatmens-savings-bank-v-grewe-mo-1884.