Boatman v. State
This text of 146 So. 3d 539 (Boatman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for writ of prohibition, petitioner seeks review of the lower tribunal’s order denying his amended motion for disqualification. Upon review, we find that the motion for disqualification was legally sufficient. The petition for writ of prohibition is therefore granted and the trial judge is directed to enter an order of disqualification which requests the chief circuit judge to appoint a successor judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 So. 3d 539, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14407, 2014 WL 4629343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatman-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.