Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co.
152 S.W.2d 390, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 530
Opinion
We conclude the action of the trial court in rendering judgment for plaintiff non obstante .veredicto was correct; defendant having waived her right to rescind as a matter of law. J. B. Colt Co. v. Head et al., Tex.Com.App., 292 S.W. 198. Likewise, her alternative suit for damages was waived, absent jury issues and findings on this phase of her cross action. All assignments and propositions have been fully considered, are overruled, and this cause is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co., 152 S.W.2d 390, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 530 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).
152 S.W.2d 390 (Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. B. Colt Co. v. Head
292 S.W. 198 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)