Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co.

152 S.W.2d 390, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 530

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 30, 1941

DocketNo. 13021

StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.W.2d 390 (Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boatman v. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co., 152 S.W.2d 390, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 530 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude the action of the trial court in rendering judgment for plaintiff non obstante .veredicto was correct; defendant having waived her right to rescind as a matter of law. J. B. Colt Co. v. Head et al., Tex.Com.App., 292 S.W. 198. Likewise, her alternative suit for damages was waived, absent jury issues and findings on this phase of her cross action. All assignments and propositions have been fully considered, are overruled, and this cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude the action of the trial court in rendering judgment for plaintiff non obstante .veredicto was correct; defendant having waived her right to rescind as a matter of law. J. B. Colt Co. v. Head et al., Tex.Com.App., 292 S.W. 198. Likewise, her alternative suit for damages was waived, absent jury issues and findings on this phase of her cross action. All assignments and propositions have been fully considered, are overruled, and this cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.W.2d 390, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatman-v-c-s-hamilton-motor-co-texapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack