Boatley v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Texas

Boatley v. Fields

24 S.W.2d 65

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 16, 1930

DocketNo. 3794.

StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.W.2d 65 (Boatley v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boatley v. Fields, 24 S.W.2d 65 (Tex. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

HODGES, J.

This suit was filed by ithe ap-pellee against the appellant to recover the sum of $25S.60, the value of groceries, board, doctor’s bill, and cash furnished to a relative of the appellants. It was alleged that those services were rendered and articles furnished at ithe instance and request of the appellants. The ease was tried before the court without a jury, and a judgment rendered in favor of the appellee. Within the time prescribed by statute appellants in writing requested the •count to file his fincjings of fact and conclusions of law. That was not done. The record contains. several assignments which cannot be passed upon intelligently without findings of fact- or conclusions of law. There is no statement of facts.

We are of the.opinion that the failure of ithe court to grant the request of the appellants and file his findings of fact and.conclusions of law is reversible error. Wandry v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.) 125 S. W. 362, and cases there referred to. • '

The judgment is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HODGES, J.

This suit was filed by ithe ap-pellee against the appellant to recover the sum of $25S.60, the value of groceries, board, doctor’s bill, and cash furnished to a relative of the appellants. It was alleged that those services were rendered and articles furnished at ithe instance and request of the appellants. The ease was tried before the court without a jury, and a judgment rendered in favor of the appellee. Within the time prescribed by statute appellants in writing requested the •count to file his fincjings of fact and conclusions of law. That was not done. The record contains. several assignments which cannot be passed upon intelligently without findings of fact- or conclusions of law. There is no statement of facts.

We are of the.opinion that the failure of ithe court to grant the request of the appellants and file his findings of fact and.conclusions of law is reversible error. Wandry v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.) 125 S. W. 362, and cases there referred to. • '

The judgment is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.W.2d 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatley-v-fields-texapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack