Boardwalk Hotels Corp. v. Conway

144 A. 921, 7 N.J. Misc. 182, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 388
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 30, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

A rule to show cause was allowed in this cause; wiry a writ of mandamus, alternative or peremptory, should not issue to the authorities of Atlantic City commanding them to issue to the relator a permit for the erection of an hotel, upon the property located _ in Atlantic City, known as the “Gordon Pier.”

Our reading of the depositions taken under the rule allowed in the case and to be used at the argument of the rule leads us to the conclusion that an alternative writ of mandamus should issue, and this will be the order of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boardwalk Hotels Corp. v. Conway, 144 A. 921, 7 N.J. Misc. 182, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 388 (N.J. 1929).

144 A. 921 (Boardwalk Hotels Corp. v. Conway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Staton v. Hrko
379 S.E.2d 159 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1989)