Boardwalk Development Co. v. July Development Co.
Opinion
Action for the partition of real property at Arverne, Queens county, including land between highl- and low-water mark. Interlocutory judgment on appeal by the city of New York reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, on authority of Marba Sea Bay Corp. v. City of New York (post, p. 764), decided herewith. In view of this decision, the appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for an extra allowance is dismissed, without costs. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Seudder and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs for the reasons stated in his concurring memorandum in Marba Sea Bay Corp. v. City of New York (post, p. 764), decided herewith. Young and Carswell, JJ., concur upon the second ground stated in Marba Sea Bay Corp. v. City of New York (post, p. 764), decided herewith. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
246 A.D. 752 (Boardwalk Development Co. v. July Development Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.