Boardman v. County of Litchfield

2 Kirby 14, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 14
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1786·Published

Opinion

granted the petition and assessed the damages at the sum of the debt—and all his previous cost.

Dyer contra.— As to the damage assessed for the damage cannot in this case arise to no more than the plaintiff has in fact lost by means of the escape which ought to be adjusted as in other causes upon the best evidence the nature [16] of the case will admit all circumstances considered.—To make the debt the sole rule tends to induce the creditors to imprison their poor insolvent debtors who they know not to be worth a farthing in hopes of their escape, and is a temptation even to yield some assistance therein in order to bring the debt on the county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boardman v. County of Litchfield, 2 Kirby 14, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 14 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

2 Kirby 14 (Boardman v. County of Litchfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.