Boardman & Conkling v. House
18 Wend. 269
This text of 18 Wend. 269 (Boardman & Conkling v. House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boardman & Conkling v. House, 18 Wend. 269 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).
Opinion
The defendant is not a resident of this state within the meaning of the act: he is here temporarily, and intends to return to Michigan. Being here for pleasure or business does not exempt him from arrest. The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 Wend. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boardman-conkling-v-house-nysupct-1835.