Board of Trustess v. Town Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Trustess v. Town Board

71 A.D.2d 647, 418 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 23, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 647 (Board of Trustess v. Town Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Trustess v. Town Board, 71 A.D.2d 647, 418 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to section 712 of the General Municipal Law to determine whether the proposed annexation by petitioner of certain land in the Town of Ramapo is in the over-all public interest, wherein this court, by order dated October 6, 1976, as amended by order dated November 4, 1977, designated Justices Ruskin, Sirignano and Rubenfeld as Referees to hear and report their findings of fact and conclusions of law, respondent moves to confirm the report of the Referees that the proposed annexation would not be in the over-all public interest. Motion granted, without costs or disbursements, and it is determined that the proposed annexation is not in the overall public interest. The report’s conclusion that the proposed annexation would not be in the over-all public interst is clearly supported by the evidence, and we confirm and adopt the report, and its findings and conclusions, as those of this court. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone, O’Connor and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to section 712 of the General Municipal Law to determine whether the proposed annexation by petitioner of certain land in the Town of Ramapo is in the over-all public interest, wherein this court, by order dated October 6, 1976, as amended by order dated November 4, 1977, designated Justices Ruskin, Sirignano and Rubenfeld as Referees to hear and report their findings of fact and conclusions of law, respondent moves to confirm the report of the Referees that the proposed annexation would not be in the over-all public interest. Motion granted, without costs or disbursements, and it is determined that the proposed annexation is not in the overall public interest. The report’s conclusion that the proposed annexation would not be in the over-all public interst is clearly supported by the evidence, and we confirm and adopt the report, and its findings and conclusions, as those of this court. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone, O’Connor and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 647, 418 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-trustess-v-town-board-nyappdiv-1979.