Board of Trustees v. Curd
This text of 8 Ky. Op. 460 (Board of Trustees v. Curd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
There is no allegation of a demand of the marshal by any party [461]*461entitled to the money alleged to be in his hands. Before a collection officer can be compelled to pay such moneys, some party must be designated to whom the payment is to be made, unless the charter in this case regulates the manner of payment. If to be paid to the town treasurer, he must make the demand, and this fact must be alleged. The trustees have no more right to the possession of the funds than the marshal who collects them; and a payment by him to á trustee would not release him from responsibility. See Owens v. Ballard County Court, 8 Bush 611. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. Op. 460, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-trustees-v-curd-kyctapp-1875.