Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow Subdivision v. Shultz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow Subdivision v. Shultz

515 S.W.3d 822, 2017 WL 676722

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. ED 104269·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant The Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow appeals the trial court’s amended judgment dismissing with prejudice its action against Respondents Damon and Amy Shultz. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant The Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow appeals the trial court’s amended judgment dismissing with prejudice its action against Respondents Damon and Amy Shultz. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow Subdivision v. Shultz, 515 S.W.3d 822, 2017 WL 676722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

515 S.W.3d 822 (Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow Subdivision v. Shultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.