Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust v. Marin Bros Inc
Opinion
9 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEE CASE NO.: 2:23−cv−00483−TL PAINTERS’ TRUST, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO vs. 12 MARIN BROS., INC., et al., Noting Date: May 7, 2024 13
Defendants. 14
15 The Plaintiffs, Board of Trustees of The Employee Painters’ Trust, et al. 16 (collectively the “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Marin Bros., Inc., Abel Marin, and Jennifer 17 Garcia (collectively the “Defendants”) (Plaintiffs and Defendants are collectively referred 18 to herein as the “Parties”), each acting by and through their undersigned counsel, 19 respectfully file this Stipulation to Stay Proceedings. This Stipulation is the Parties’ first 20 request to stay the proceedings and is made for cause and not for the purpose of delay. 21 This Stipulation is made with respect to the following: 22 1. The Court issued an Order Setting Bench Trial Date and Related Dates on October 23 27, 2023 [ECF No. 17]. The Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ Stipulated Motion 24 to Extend Deadlines on February 5, 2024 [ECF No. 24]. The current deadline for motions 25 related to discovery is May 8, 2024. The current deadline for completion of discovery is 26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN 1 June 7, 2024. 2 2. This case centers on alleged fringe benefit payment obligations arising from 3 Collective Bargaining Agreements (“CBA”) between the International Union of Painters 4 and Allied Trades District Council No. 5 (“Union”) and Defendant Marin Bros., Inc. 5 (“Marin Bros”). 6 3. The Plaintiffs, as employee benefit trust funds governed by the Employee 7 Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), have alleged the right to be paid certain 8 fringe benefit contributions and related damages for work performed by Marin Bros’ 9 employees pursuant to the terms of the CBA. 10 4. The Plaintiffs alleged in the Complaint [ECF No. 1] the right to perform a payroll 11 compliance review (audit) of Marin Bros’ payroll and related records to determine the 12 extent of contributions of contributions owed to the Plaintiffs. See Cent. States, Se. & Sw. 13 Areas Pension Fund v. Cent. Transp., Inc., 472 U.S. 559, 573-74 (1985) (discussing the 14 role of a payroll auditor in determining unpaid contributions). 15 5. Since the filing of the Complaint, the parties have engaged in diligent discovery, 16 have worked together to avoid any court intervention of discovery issues, and have 17 cooperated with sharing documents and information so that an audit of Marin Bros’ 18 records could be performed by a professional accounting firm engaged by the Plaintiffs. 19 6. The Plaintiffs’ auditor issued a report for the period March 1, 2022 through 20 December 31, 2022 (“First Audit Period”). The Plaintiffs’ auditor is now in the process of 21 completing an audit for the period of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 22 (“Second Audit Period”). Plaintiffs’ auditor requires additional time to complete its 23 review. 24 7. Additionally, the Defendants engaged a separate professional accounting firm to 25 conduct their own review of Marin Bros’ payroll records. The Defendants’ auditor 26 recently issued its preliminary report but will need additional time to conduct a review
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN 1 and prepare a report for the Second Audit Period. 2 8. The parties expect that they will soon have competing audit reports that will need 3 to be reviewed and evaluated before discovery in this case can continue. 4 9. Additionally, the Parties intend to evaluate whether settlement discussions will be 5 fruitful and hope to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations once final audit results 6 are issued by each auditor. The Parties are committed to their ongoing obligation to 7 explore settlement options in this case. 8 10. The Parties agree that a ninety (90) day stay of proceedings is warranted due to the 9 need to complete the audits and to allow for discussion of the results of the audits and 10 potential settlement. 11 11. This Stipulation is made to avoid unnecessary expenditure of resources in 12 litigation and is not intended to delay or for any improper purpose. 13 12. Accordingly, the Parties by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and 14 agree, subject to the Court’s approval, that these proceedings and all unexpired deadlines 15 set forth in the Court’s February 5, 2024 Order [ECF No. 24] shall be stayed for ninety 16 (90) days from the date of entry of an Order on this Stipulation. 17 13. No later than two weeks prior to the expiration of the stay, the Parties will meet 18 and confer and file a joint status report to update the Court on the status of the audits, 19 settlement, and, if not settled, a schedule for how the Parties intend to complete discovery. 20 DATED this 7th day of May, 2024.
22 By: /s/ Wesley J. Smith By: /s/ Michelle Q. Pham Wesley J. Smith, WSBA #51934 Michelle Q. Pham, WSBA # 44286 23 7440 W. Sahara Ave. 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3100 Las Vegas, NV 89021 Seattle, WA 98101 24 (702) 255-1718 (206) 319-7052 wes@cjmlv.com Email: mpham@buchalter.com 25 Counsel for Plaintiffs Board of Trustees Counsel for Defendants Marin Bros., Inc., of the Employee Painters’ Trust, et al. Abel Marin, and Jennifer Garcia 26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN 1 ORDER 2 Good Cause Appearing, in accordance with the foregoing Stipulation, these 3 proceedings and all unexpired deadlines set forth in the Court’s February 5, 2024 Order 4 [ECF No. 24] shall be stayed for ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this Order. No 5 later than two weeks prior to the expiration of the stay, the Parties will meet and confer 6 and file a joint status report to update the Court on the status of the audits, settlement, and, 7 if not settled, a schedule for how the Parties intend to complete discovery. 8
9 DATED this 7th day of May, 2024.
10 A 11 Tana Lin 12 United States District Judge
14 Presented by: By: /s/ Wesley J. Smith 16 Wesley J. Smith, Esq. WSBA # 51934 17 7440 W. Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89117 18 P. (702) 255-1718/F. (702) 255-0871 Email: wes@cjmlv.com 19 Counsel for Plaintiffs
21 22 23 24 25 26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust v. Marin Bros Inc (Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust v. Marin Bros Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.