Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedSeptember 10, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-01048
StatusUnknown

This text of Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc. (Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 Charles P. Hamamjian, State Bar No. 298685 SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND, PC 2 5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 400 Fresno, California 93704 3 Telephone: (559) 421-7000 Facsimile: (559) 473-1483 4 Attorneys for Defendant, TRINITY CONSTRUCTION 5 ENTERPRISES INC dba TRINITY POWER 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 9 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF IBEW LOCAL 10 100 PENSION TRUST FUND; BOARD OF Case No.: 1:23−CV−01048−KES−BAM TRUSTEES OF JOINT ELECTRICAL 11 INDUSTRY TRAINING TRUST FUND; [PROPOSED] STIPULATED BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NECA/IBEW PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 FAMILY MEDICAL CARE TRUST FUND; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NATIONAL 13 ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 TRINITY CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC dba TRINITY 17 POWER; and DOES 1 through 50, 18 Defendants.

19 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 22 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 23 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 24 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 25 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 26 or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 27 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 28 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 1 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 2 Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied 3 when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 4 2. DEFINITIONS 5 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 6 information or items under this Order. 7 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 8 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 9 Civil Procedure 26(c). 10 2.3 “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: extremely sensitive 11 “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create 12 a substantial risk of harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. Information designated 13 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY cannot be shared with the attorneys’ clients, including parties to this 14 action, unless and until this Court issues a Court Order specifically permitting its view by the 15 particular party or parties named in any such order that may be entered. 16 2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 17 as their support staff). 18 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 19 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “ATTORNEYS’ 20 EYES ONLY.” 21 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 22 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 23 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 24 discovery in this matter. 25 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 26 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 27 consultant in this action. 28 1 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 3 entity not named as a Party to this action. 4 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 5 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on 6 behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 7 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 8 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 9 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 10 Material in this action. 11 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 12 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 13 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 14 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 15 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 16 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 17 Producing Party. 18 3. SCOPE 19 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 20 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 21 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 22 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 23 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 24 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 25 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 26 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 27 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 28 1 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use 2 of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 3 4. DURATION 4 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 5 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 6 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 7 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 8 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the 9 time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 10 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 11 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 12 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 13 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 14 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or 15 oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 16 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within 17 the ambit of this Order. 18 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 19 to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 20 encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens 21 on other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions, pursuant to the Federal Rules of 22 Civil Procedure and Local Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-trustees-of-ibew-local-100-pension-trust-fund-v-trinity-caed-2024.