Board of Trustees Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan v. Carney

Fourth Circuit

Board of Trustees Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan v. Carney

577 F. App'x 214

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 1, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1300

StatusPublished

This text of 577 F. App'x 214 (Board of Trustees Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Trustees Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan v. Carney, 577 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Santina M. Carney appeals the district court’s orders precluding her from challenging the validity of a 1983 divorce decree and determining that she has no claim for benefits under her former husband’s pension plan, retirement plan, or health and benefit plan, and also denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Carney’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Board of Trustees Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan v. Carney, No. 1:13-cv-01005-WMN (D.Md. Dec. 3, 2013; Mar. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Santina M. Carney appeals the district court’s orders precluding her from challenging the validity of a 1983 divorce decree and determining that she has no claim for benefits under her former husband’s pension plan, retirement plan, or health and benefit plan, and also denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Carney’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Board of Trustees Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan v. Carney, No. 1:13-cv-01005-WMN (D.Md. Dec. 3, 2013; Mar. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 F. App'x 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-trustees-masters-mates-pilots-pension-plan-v-carney-ca4-2014.