Board of Supervisors v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad

Mississippi Supreme Court

Board of Supervisors v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad

56 So. 173, 99 Miss. 845

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 56 So. 173 (Board of Supervisors v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Supervisors v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad, 56 So. 173, 99 Miss. 845 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Whitfield.

The petition filed by the appellee should have been granted by the board of supervisors. It is a plain case of overvaluation, known to be such, within the meaning of section 4312 of the Code of 1906. The reporter is directed to set out the agreed statement of facts in full, so as to show the exact casé which we decide.

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and for the reasons therein indicated the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI