Board of Supervisors v. Brodhead

New York Supreme Court

Board of Supervisors v. Brodhead

44 How. Pr. 426, 1873 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 131

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 44 How. Pr. 426 (Board of Supervisors v. Brodhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Supervisors v. Brodhead, 44 How. Pr. 426, 1873 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 131 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Learned, J.

Held. That the proceedings in an action must be taken by and in the name of the attorney of record ; that before another attorney can act or be heard in the cause, a regular substitution must be made so that the record shows his authority, that a party has no right to interfere with the due and orderly conduct of the suit by his attorney; aud therefore ordered that Mr. Cantine had no standing in court as attorney for the plaintiff) and that this motion could not be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Learned, J.

Held. That the proceedings in an action must be taken by and in the name of the attorney of record ; that before another attorney can act or be heard in the cause, a regular substitution must be made so that the record shows his authority, that a party has no right to interfere with the due and orderly conduct of the suit by his attorney; aud therefore ordered that Mr. Cantine had no standing in court as attorney for the plaintiff) and that this motion could not be entertained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 How. Pr. 426, 1873 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-supervisors-v-brodhead-nysupct-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack