Board of Supervisors of Shelby County v. People ex rel. Commissioners of Highways

159 Ill. 242
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 159 Ill. 242 (Board of Supervisors of Shelby County v. People ex rel. Commissioners of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Supervisors of Shelby County v. People ex rel. Commissioners of Highways, 159 Ill. 242 (Ill. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a petition for mandamus, filed by the People on the relation of the commissioners of highways of the town of Shelbyville, in the county of Shelby, to compel the board of supervisors of that county to pay $1400.00, which was appropriated by the board at its September session in 1883 to aid in the construction of a bridge. To the petition, as finally amended, pleas were filed, and the cause was tried by agreement before the circuit judge without a jury. The circuit court found the issues for the petitioner, and ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue to the board, requiring them to pay to the relators the sum of $1400.00, and that the defendant, the board, pay the costs. From the judgment thus rendered by the circuit court, an appeal has been taken directly to this court.

It is clear, that we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. The case is not one, which involves a franchise, or freehold, or the validity of a statute or construction of the constitution, nor is it a case relating to revenue, or in which the State is interested as a party or otherwise. 'Under our statute, a mandamus proceeding is an action at law, and governed by the same rules of pleading that are applicable to other actions at law. (2 Starr & Curtis’ Stat. pp. 1587, 1588; Rev. Stat. chap. 87, sec. 4; Dement v. Rokker, 126 Ill. 174). The judgment is one which directs the payment of a specific sum of money. The appeal should, therefore, have been taken to the Appellate Court and not to this court. Leave is granted to withdraw the record for the purpose of filing the same in the Appellate Court.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Douglas v. Powell
274 Ill. 222 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1916)
Harrison v. Boetter
88 Ill. App. 549 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Gunning v. People ex rel. Butterick Publishing Co.
76 Ill. App. 574 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
Weimer v. People
72 Ill. App. 119 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
People ex rel. Comrs. of Highways v. Board of Supervisors
48 N.E. 100 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1897)
Swift v. People ex rel. Cohen
43 N.E. 731 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 Ill. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-supervisors-of-shelby-county-v-people-ex-rel-commissioners-of-ill-1896.