Board of School Directors of Rose Tree Media School District v. Feldman

388 A.2d 686, 479 Pa. 341, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 728
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 14, 1978
DocketNo. 421
StatusPublished

This text of 388 A.2d 686 (Board of School Directors of Rose Tree Media School District v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of School Directors of Rose Tree Media School District v. Feldman, 388 A.2d 686, 479 Pa. 341, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 728 (Pa. 1978).

Opinions

OPINION

NIX, Justice.

The appellant, the Board of School Directors of Rose Tree Media School District (School Board), dismissed the appellee, Robert M. Feldman, from his employment as a non-tenured teacher after a hearing pursuant to section 4 of the Local Agency Law, Act of December 2, 1968, P.L. 1133, § 4, 53 P.S. § 11304. Feldman appealed his dismissal to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County which affirmed the School Board’s adjudication of dismissal. Feldman then appealed this determination to Commonwealth Court. A three-judge panel of that court reversed,1 relying on this Court’s decision in Horn v. Township of Hilltown, 461 Pa. 745, 337 A.2d 858 (1975) and their court’s decision in Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Feeser, 20 Pa. Cmwlth. 406, 341 A.2d 584 (1975), rev’d, 469 Pa. 173, 364 A.2d 1324 (1976). The School Board filed in this Court a petition for allowance of appeal which we denied. The Board then filed a petition for reconsideration of that denial. We granted reconsideration and this appeal followed.

At the time of its decision of this case, the Commonwealth Court did not have the benefit of our decision in Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Feeser, 469 Pa. 173, 364 A.2d 1324 (1976), which overruled the Commonwealth Court in that case and clarified our decision in Horn v. Township of Hilltown, supra. See also State Dental Council and Examining Board v. Pollock, 457 Pa. 264, 318 A.2d 910 (1974).

[343]*343We therefore remand this case to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Feeser, supra.

MANDERINO, J., files a dissenting opinion joined by EAGEN, C. J. PACKEL, J., did not participate in the decision of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horn v. Township of Hilltown
337 A.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
State Dental Council & Examining Board v. Pollock
318 A.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
In Re: Appeal of Feldman
346 A.2d 895 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
COM. PA., HUMAN REL. COM'N v. Feeser
364 A.2d 1324 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Feeser
341 A.2d 584 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 A.2d 686, 479 Pa. 341, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-school-directors-of-rose-tree-media-school-district-v-feldman-pa-1978.