Board of Regents of University System v. Oelke

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Board of Regents of University System v. Oelke

175 S.E.2d 896, 121 Ga. App. 804, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1366

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 26, 1970

Docket44525

StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E.2d 896 (Board of Regents of University System v. Oelke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Regents of University System v. Oelke, 175 S.E.2d 896, 121 Ga. App. 804, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1366 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

The Supreme Court, in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Board of Regents of the University System of Ga. and Oelke v. Board of Regents of the University System of Ga., 226 Ga. 310, having reversed the judgment of this court in Board of Regents of the University System of Ga. v. Oelke, 120 Ga. App. 667 (172 SE2d 183), the previous judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in denying the motion of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia to intervene in the civil action instituted by Mrs. Oelke against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

The Supreme Court, in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Board of Regents of the University System of Ga. and Oelke v. Board of Regents of the University System of Ga., 226 Ga. 310, having reversed the judgment of this court in Board of Regents of the University System of Ga. v. Oelke, 120 Ga. App. 667 (172 SE2d 183), the previous judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in denying the motion of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia to intervene in the civil action instituted by Mrs. Oelke against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 S.E.2d 896, 121 Ga. App. 804, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-regents-of-university-system-v-oelke-gactapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack