Board of Public Instruction v. Marshall
227 So. 2d 83, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5032
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record hav-
[84]*84ing been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate that this interlocutory appeal has substantial merit, the said appeal, pursuant to our rules, is dismissed. See Hankins v. Title and Trust Co., 169 So.2d 526 (Fla. App.1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Public Instruction v. Marshall, 227 So. 2d 83, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5032 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
227 So. 2d 83 (Board of Public Instruction v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hankins v. Title and Trust Company of Florida
169 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)