Board of Pharmacy v. Faunce

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Board of Pharmacy v. Faunce

141 A. 923, 6 N.J. Misc. 385, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 302

DecidedApril 19, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A. 923 (Board of Pharmacy v. Faunce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Pharmacy v. Faunce, 141 A. 923, 6 N.J. Misc. 385, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 302 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These cases have been argued together. Both defendants were charged with the violation of section 2 of an act entitled “An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy in this state.” 3 Gomp. Stat., p. 3944.

The defendants were both convicted in the small cause court, but on appeal to the Common Pleas, that court granted a nonsuit.

We consider that the legal propriety of that action is fairly debatable, and a writ of certiorari is granted in each case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These cases have been argued together. Both defendants were charged with the violation of section 2 of an act entitled “An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy in this state.” 3 Gomp. Stat., p. 3944.

The defendants were both convicted in the small cause court, but on appeal to the Common Pleas, that court granted a nonsuit.

We consider that the legal propriety of that action is fairly debatable, and a writ of certiorari is granted in each case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A. 923, 6 N.J. Misc. 385, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-pharmacy-v-faunce-nj-1928.