Board of Mgrs. of the Towers on the Park Condominium v. Cruz

2020 NY Slip Op 06204, 187 A.D.3d 666, 131 N.Y.S.3d 557
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 2020
DocketIndex No. 157132/17 Appeal No. 12224 Case No. 2019-4666
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06204 (Board of Mgrs. of the Towers on the Park Condominium v. Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Mgrs. of the Towers on the Park Condominium v. Cruz, 2020 NY Slip Op 06204, 187 A.D.3d 666, 131 N.Y.S.3d 557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Board of Mgrs. of the Towers on the Park Condominium v Cruz (2020 NY Slip Op 06204)
Board of Mgrs. of the Towers on the Park Condominium v Cruz
2020 NY Slip Op 06204
Decided on October 29, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 29, 2020
Before: Renwick, J.P., Gesmer, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Index No. 157132/17 Appeal No. 12224 Case No. 2019-4666

[*1]Board of Managers of the Towers on the Park Condominium, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Josefina Cruz, Defendant-Appellant.


Josefina Crus, appellant pro se.

Wagner, Berkow & Brandt, LLP, New York (Bonnie Reid Berkow of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (James E. d'Auguste, J.), entered May 13, 2019, which confirmed a Referee's report granting a foreclosure and sale under Real Property Law § 339-z and 339-aa, and awarding a money judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $91,777.23 with interest at 9% per annum since October 1, 2018, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

According to plaintiff's appendix, defendant has satisfied the judgment, thereby rendering this appeal academic (see Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]; Emerald Cr. Capital, LLC v Trencher, 174 AD3d 405 [1st Dept 2019]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 29, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wisholek v. Douglas
769 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 06204, 187 A.D.3d 666, 131 N.Y.S.3d 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-mgrs-of-the-towers-on-the-park-condominium-v-cruz-nyappdiv-2020.