Board of Metropolitan Police v. Board of Auditors

53 N.W. 390, 93 Mich. 306
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 12, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 N.W. 390 (Board of Metropolitan Police v. Board of Auditors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Metropolitan Police v. Board of Auditors, 53 N.W. 390, 93 Mich. 306 (Mich. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a mandamus to compel tbe payment of expenses incurred in tbe pursuit of one charged with an offense committed in tbe city of Detroit.

Tbe act creating the board of metropolitan police provides that—

“Whenever any crime shall be committed in said city, and tbe person or persons accused or suspected of being guilty shall flee from justice, tbe said board of police may, at their discretion, authorize any person or persons to pursue and arrest such accused or suspected person or persons, [307]*307and return them to tbe proper court having jurisdiction oí the offense for trial." Section 8, Charter, p. 315.

The same section makes it the duty of the board—

“To audit and allow all bills for traveling expenses' incurred in the pursuit of criminals by members of the force or any other officer or person, and to present the same to the board of county auditors of Wayne county for payment, in all cases where criminals are charged with offenses committed in said city; and the said board of auditors shall in no case allow or cause to be paid by said county any bill or account for the pursuit or apprehension of criminals charged with or suspected of the commission of crime in said city, unless the said bill or account is presented by said board of police, and indorsed as allowed by the president and secretary thereof."

The case is ruled by People v. Board of Auditors, 13 Mich. 233. Section 211 of the act must be construed with section 8, and expenses incurred in the pursuit of criminals must be regarded as excepted from section 21.

The mandamus will issue as prayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wayne County Jail Inmates v. Wayne County Sheriff
216 N.W.2d 910 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)
Sunderlin v. Board of Supervisors of Ionia Co.
78 N.W. 651 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 N.W. 390, 93 Mich. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-metropolitan-police-v-board-of-auditors-mich-1892.