Board of Managers of the Stewart Place Condominium v. Stewart Place Acquisition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Managers of the Stewart Place Condominium v. Stewart Place Acquisition Corp.

255 A.D.2d 351, 679 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11781

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 351 (Board of Managers of the Stewart Place Condominium v. Stewart Place Acquisition Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Managers of the Stewart Place Condominium v. Stewart Place Acquisition Corp., 255 A.D.2d 351, 679 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Stewart Place Acquisition Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Friedman, J.H.O.), entered April 30, 1997, which, after a framed-issue hearing, determined that the plaintiff was authorized to bring this action and, in effect, denied its motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs president executed a resolution authorizing the commencement of the action and a majority of the plaintiffs board of managers approved the commencement of the action. Accordingly, the plaintiff was authorized to commence this action (see, Happy Banana v Tishman Constr. Corp., 179 AD2d 562; Matter of Paloma Frocks [Shamokin Sportswear Corp.], 3 NY2d 572, 575-576; see also, Business Corporation Law § 715 [g]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Stewart Place Acquisition Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Friedman, J.H.O.), entered April 30, 1997, which, after a framed-issue hearing, determined that the plaintiff was authorized to bring this action and, in effect, denied its motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs president executed a resolution authorizing the commencement of the action and a majority of the plaintiffs board of managers approved the commencement of the action. Accordingly, the plaintiff was authorized to commence this action (see, Happy Banana v Tishman Constr. Corp., 179 AD2d 562; Matter of Paloma Frocks [Shamokin Sportswear Corp.], 3 NY2d 572, 575-576; see also, Business Corporation Law § 715 [g]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 351, 679 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-managers-of-the-stewart-place-condominium-v-stewart-place-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack