Board of Managers of the 200 West 109 Condominium v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Managers of the 200 West 109 Condominium v. Baker

244 A.D.2d 229, 664 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11521

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 229 (Board of Managers of the 200 West 109 Condominium v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Managers of the 200 West 109 Condominium v. Baker, 244 A.D.2d 229, 664 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from decision, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), dated December 24,1996, deemed to be an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper), same court and Justice, entered February 14, 1997, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action of the complaint, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $41,052.08 and granted plaintiff summary judgment dismissing defendants’ counterclaim, and so considered, said order and judgment (one paper), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There are no triable issues of fact that preclude summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, either on its complaint or with respect to defendants’ counterclaims. Defendants, owners of a condominium unit, which they rent for profit, were not entitled to withhold the payment of common charges and special assessments owing to the Board of Managers because of a water leak within their unit (Frisch v Bellmarc Mgt., 190 AD2d 383). Defendants’ counterclaims alleging a breach of contract, a breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference with a contractual relationship lack any factual support in the record, and therefore, were properly dismissed. We have considered defendants’ other contentions and find them to be without [230]*230merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Nardelli and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from decision, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), dated December 24,1996, deemed to be an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper), same court and Justice, entered February 14, 1997, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action of the complaint, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $41,052.08 and granted plaintiff summary judgment dismissing defendants’ counterclaim, and so considered, said order and judgment (one paper), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There are no triable issues of fact that preclude summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, either on its complaint or with respect to defendants’ counterclaims. Defendants, owners of a condominium unit, which they rent for profit, were not entitled to withhold the payment of common charges and special assessments owing to the Board of Managers because of a water leak within their unit (Frisch v Bellmarc Mgt., 190 AD2d 383). Defendants’ counterclaims alleging a breach of contract, a breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference with a contractual relationship lack any factual support in the record, and therefore, were properly dismissed. We have considered defendants’ other contentions and find them to be without [230]*230merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Nardelli and Colabella, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 229, 664 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-managers-of-the-200-west-109-condominium-v-baker-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack