Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium v. Cambourakis

99 A.D.3d 554, 951 N.Y.S.2d 872

Opinion

The court properly denied the petition seeking discovery from respondent Bright Horizons, a nonparty in the underlying arbitration proceeding, because the parties to the arbitration did not stipulate to conduct discovery of Bright Horizons (see CPLR 3102 [b], [c]; cf. Matter of ACE Am. Ins. Co., 6 Misc 3d 1005[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51732[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2004]; Textron, Inc. v Unisys Corp., 138 Misc 2d 124, 126 [Sup Ct, NY County 1987]).

We have considered the Board’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ, Sweeny, Acosta, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium v. Cambourakis, 99 A.D.3d 554, 951 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

99 A.D.3d 554 (Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium v. Cambourakis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Textron, Inc. v. Unisys Corp.
138 Misc. 2d 124 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)