Board of Liquidation v. Board of Commissioners

296 U.S. 540, 56 S. Ct. 141
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1935·No. No. 381·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question which the appellants are entitled to raise. (1) Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. Oshkosh, 187 U. S. 437, 439; Von Hoffman v. Quincy, 4 Wall. 535, 553-554; South Carolina v. Gaillard, 101 U. S. 433, 437-438; Hill v. Merchants’ Ins. Co., 134 U. S. 515, 527; Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122, 200. (2) Columbus & Greenville Ry. v. Miller, 283 U. S. 96, 99-100; Hooker v. Burr, 194 U. S. 415, 418-419; Williams v. Eggleston, 170 U. S. 304, 309.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Liquidation v. Board of Commissioners, 296 U.S. 540, 56 S. Ct. 141 (1935).

296 U.S. 540 (Board of Liquidation v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callihan v. Department of Labor & Industries
516 P.2d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)
Quartemont v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury
228 So. 2d 199 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Louisiana Gas Service Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
162 So. 2d 555 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964)