Board of Justices v. Fennimore

1 N.J.L. 281
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Board of Justices v. Fennimore. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 N.J.L. 190
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1794·Published

Opinion

Per Cur.

The evidence is admissible. These bonds must have been received as cash, for the defendant, in the capacity of county collector, had no right to receive them in any other way. He is therefore answerable as for so much cash; he makes himself the debtor by receiving them. Besides, after having admitted the correctness of the charge against him on a former occasion, he will not be permitted, without showing some good reason, to question it now.

Read, for plaintiffs, called for defendant’s book, and said it was in court yesterday.

Leake said the notice to produce it was only given this morning.

Per Cur.

The excuse is futile; unless the book is produced, every presumption must be made against the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Justices v. Fennimore, 1 N.J.L. 281 (N.J. 1794).

1 N.J.L. 281 (Board of Justices v. Fennimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.