Board of Health v. Valentine

14 N.Y.S. 941, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1019, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 11, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.Y.S. 941 (Board of Health v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Health v. Valentine, 14 N.Y.S. 941, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1019, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Pratt, J.

None of the exceptions have any merit. The charge of the-judge was not excepted to. The questions are all settled by the previous decision, reported 11 N. Y. Supp. .112. The ease of Sturgis v. Spofford, 45 N. Y. 446, has no application, for the reason that the statute there construed gave a single penalty of $100, and it was pointed out by the court that it was. not given for each offense. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sturgis v. . Spofford
45 N.Y. 446 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 N.Y.S. 941, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1019, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-health-v-valentine-nysupct-1891.