Board of Health v. Valentine
14 N.Y.S. 941, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1019, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Board of Health v. Valentine. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 N.Y.S. 112 →
Opinion
None of the exceptions have any merit. The charge of the-judge was not excepted to. The questions are all settled by the previous decision, reported 11 N. Y. Supp. .112. The ease of Sturgis v. Spofford, 45 N. Y. 446, has no application, for the reason that the statute there construed gave a single penalty of $100, and it was pointed out by the court that it was. not given for each offense. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Health v. Valentine, 14 N.Y.S. 941, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1019, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
14 N.Y.S. 941 (Board of Health v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sturgis v. . Spofford
45 N.Y. 446 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)