Board of Health v. Diamond Paper Mills Co.
53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 793, 19 Dickinson 793, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 215
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance—The Ciliep-Jus tice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Collins, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Health v. Diamond Paper Mills Co., 53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 793, 19 Dickinson 793, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1902).
53 A. 1125 (Board of Health v. Diamond Paper Mills Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Morse
80 A. 189 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1911)