Board of Education v. URS Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Board of Education v. URS Co.

72 Ohio St. 3d 188

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1995·No. No. 94-2378·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The discretionary appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. [189]*189Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425. Only that portion of the court of appeals’ opinion that finds the indemnification and contribution claims of URS Company to be time barred by R.C. 2305.131 is reversed. The portion of the appellate opinion addressing URS Company’s fraud claims is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The discretionary appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. [189]*189Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425. Only that portion of the court of appeals’ opinion that finds the indemnification and contribution claims of URS Company to be time barred by R.C. 2305.131 is reversed. The portion of the appellate opinion addressing URS Company’s fraud claims is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Board of Education v. URS Co., 72 Ohio St. 3d 188 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

72 Ohio St. 3d 188 (Board of Education v. URS Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related