Board of Education v. United Federation of Teachers, Local 2

304 A.D.2d 826, 757 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 28, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 304 A.D.2d 826 (Board of Education v. United Federation of Teachers, Local 2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Education v. United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, 304 A.D.2d 826, 757 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the appeal, as limited by the brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gigante, J.), dated November 20, 2001, as granted the petition to vacate the award to the extent of remitting the matter to the arbitrator to determine whether the petitioner’s determination that Dorothy Jenkins committed an act of corporal punishment was arbitrary or capricious, and denied the cross motion to confirm the award.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the arbitration award is confirmed.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to vacate the arbitrator’s award to the extent of remitting the matter for a new determination as to whether the petitioner’s determination that Dorothy Jenkins, a paraprofessional, committed an act of corporal punishment was arbitrary or capricious, and denying the appellant’s cross motion to confirm the award. The award, which rested upon the arbitrator’s interpretation of the labor agreement, did not violate a strong public policy, was not [827]*827irrational, and. did not clearly exceed a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator’s power (see Matter of Albany County Sheriffs Local 775 of Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO [County of Albany], 63 NY2d 654 [1984]; Matter of Elmira Hgts. Cent. School Dist. [Elmira Hgts. Educ. Support Staff Assn.], 250 AD2d 983 [1998]; see also Matter of Wicks Constr. [Green], 295 AD2d 527 [2002]; Matter of Recore [Chateaugay Cent. School Dist.], 256 AD2d 801 [1998]; Matter of Neiman v Backer, 211 AD2d 721 [1995]). Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of City of Yonkers v. Police Benevolent Assn. of the City of Yonkers
177 N.Y.S.3d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
City of Middletown v. City of Middletown Police Benevolent Ass'n
30 A.D.3d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Ebercohn-Mauro v. Board of Education of the City School District
5 A.D.3d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 826, 757 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-united-federation-of-teachers-local-2-nyappdiv-2003.