Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley

128 A.D.2d 1024, 513 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44666
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err, as a matter of law, in reversing the order of Special Term, granting the motion and dismissing the third-party complaint against third-party defendant Thompson Construction Corporation, with leave to replead so much thereof as asserted a cause of action for indemnification within 20 days after service of a copy of the order?” Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, 128 A.D.2d 1024, 513 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

128 A.D.2d 1024 (Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. HE Yerkes and Associates, Inc.
675 F. Supp. 139 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Long Island Lighting Co. v. IMO Delaval, Inc.
668 F. Supp. 237 (S.D. New York, 1987)