Board of Education v. Pearl River Teachers Ass'n, Local 1969

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education v. Pearl River Teachers Ass'n, Local 1969

57 A.D.2d 618, 393 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11629

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 618 (Board of Education v. Pearl River Teachers Ass'n, Local 1969) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education v. Pearl River Teachers Ass'n, Local 1969, 57 A.D.2d 618, 393 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitrator’s award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 10, 1976, which denied its application and granted respondent’s cross application to confirm the award. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioner-appellant’s contention that the arbitrator, in effect, rewrote the parties’ collective bargaining agreement by his decision, is unsupported. No ground upon which this court could vacate the arbitrator’s award has been established by the petitioner (see CPLR 7511). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitrator’s award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 10, 1976, which denied its application and granted respondent’s cross application to confirm the award. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioner-appellant’s contention that the arbitrator, in effect, rewrote the parties’ collective bargaining agreement by his decision, is unsupported. No ground upon which this court could vacate the arbitrator’s award has been established by the petitioner (see CPLR 7511). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 618, 393 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-pearl-river-teachers-assn-local-1969-nyappdiv-1977.