Board of Education v. Levittown United Teachers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education v. Levittown United Teachers

213 A.D.2d 481, 624 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2649

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 481 (Board of Education v. Levittown United Teachers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education v. Levittown United Teachers, 213 A.D.2d 481, 624 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 14, 1993, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The dispute between the parties does not fall clearly and unequivocally within the class of claims that the parties agreed would be referred to arbitration (see, Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509). Accordingly, the application of the petitioner Board of Education for a stay of arbitration was properly granted. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 14, 1993, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The dispute between the parties does not fall clearly and unequivocally within the class of claims that the parties agreed would be referred to arbitration (see, Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509). Accordingly, the application of the petitioner Board of Education for a stay of arbitration was properly granted. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 481, 624 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-levittown-united-teachers-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack