Board of Education v. Kelley
This text of 55 S.E. 238 (Board of Education v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where a suit has been dismissed by the plaintiff, in order to bring a second suit for the same cause of action the plaintiff must pay the costs, or file a pauper affidavit stating his inability to do so. A failure in this regard furnishes ground for a plea in abatement. Civil Code, §5043; Langston v. Marks, 68 Ga. 435; Sweeney v. Malloy, 107 Ga. 83; Johnson v. Central Ry. Co., 119 Ga. 185; Wright v. Jett, 120 Ga. 995.
2. That the clerk of the superior court, on request of counsel for the plaintiff, charged the cost to such counsel, and released the plaintiff, stating that he also “had authority to collect for the sheriff as well as himself,” would not suffice. This was not an actual payment of the cost, at least [480]*480as to the sheriff; nor did it appear that the clerk in fact had authority, as to the cost due the sheriff, to release the plaintiff and charge it to-the attorney. Authority to collect for the sheriff did not include authority to release the plaintiff and charge the cost to another.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 S.E. 238, 126 Ga. 479, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-kelley-ga-1906.