Board of Education v. Hood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Board of Education v. Hood

204 N.C. 353

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 N.C. 353 (Board of Education v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education v. Hood, 204 N.C. 353 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Brogden, J.

Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brogden, J.

Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 N.C. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-hood-nc-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack