Board of Education v. Hood
204 N.C. 353
Opinion
Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Education v. Hood, 204 N.C. 353 (N.C. 1933).
204 N.C. 353 (Board of Education v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Royal Mfg. Co. v. Spradlin
6 F. Supp. 98 (M.D. North Carolina, 1934)