Board of Education v. Hood

204 N.C. 353
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Brogden, J.

Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Education v. Hood, 204 N.C. 353 (N.C. 1933).

204 N.C. 353 (Board of Education v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Royal Mfg. Co. v. Spradlin
6 F. Supp. 98 (M.D. North Carolina, 1934)