Board of Education v. Henderson
This text of 42 A.D. 237 (Board of Education v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, upon the question of the defendant’s residence. Both parties having requested the direction of a verdict, the defendant, as to that question, is concluded.
The assessors having had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of his property for the purpose of taxation, their assessment cannot be attacked collaterally. His remedy was to review the assessment by a direct proceeding for that purpose'. (United States Trust Co. v. Mayor, etc., of New Work, 144 N. Y. 488.)
All concurred, except Spring, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 A.D. 237, 59 N.Y.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-henderson-nyappdiv-1899.