Board of Education v. Henderson

42 A.D. 237, 59 N.Y.S. 1098
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Nash, J.:

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, upon the question of the defendant’s residence. Both parties having requested the direction of a verdict, the defendant, as to that question, is concluded.

The assessors having had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of his property for the purpose of taxation, their assessment cannot be attacked collaterally. His remedy was to review the assessment by a direct proceeding for that purpose'. (United States Trust Co. v. Mayor, etc., of New Work, 144 N. Y. 488.)

All concurred, except Spring, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Education v. Henderson, 42 A.D. 237, 59 N.Y.S. 1098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

42 A.D. 237 (Board of Education v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dale v. City of New York
71 A.D. 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)