Board of Education v. Ambach

457 N.E.2d 775, 60 N.Y.2d 758, 469 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3444
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, to the respondents against the board of education.

We would note that under the circumstances of this case the petitioning students had no reasonable expectation of receiving a high school diploma without passing competency tests. Nor on the record can it be said that they were denied adequate notice of the requirement, in view of the fact that the regulation had been in effect for three years prior to the completion of their studies. For the reasons stated in the opinion of Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division, the petitioners’ other contentions do not warrant the relief requested.

[762]*762Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Education v. Ambach, 457 N.E.2d 775, 60 N.Y.2d 758, 469 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3444 (N.Y. 1983).

457 N.E.2d 775 (Board of Education v. Ambach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cuttita
2003 NY Slip Op 51506(U) (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Rene Ex Rel. Rene v. Reed
751 N.E.2d 736 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)