Board of Education of Victor Central School District v. Victor Teachers Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education of Victor Central School District v. Victor Teachers Ass'n

171 A.D.2d 1029, 579 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D.2d 1029 (Board of Education of Victor Central School District v. Victor Teachers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education of Victor Central School District v. Victor Teachers Ass'n, 171 A.D.2d 1029, 579 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the District’s application for a stay of arbitration of the Association’s grievance which alleged that the District’s application of prior experience credit to female unit members was discriminatory. The grievance alleges a violation of the contractual salary schedules and the contractual guarantee of equal opportunity, which are within the scope of the parties agreement to arbitrate. (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Curran, J. — Arbitration.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the District’s application for a stay of arbitration of the Association’s grievance which alleged that the District’s application of prior experience credit to female unit members was discriminatory. The grievance alleges a violation of the contractual salary schedules and the contractual guarantee of equal opportunity, which are within the scope of the parties agreement to arbitrate. (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Curran, J. — Arbitration.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D.2d 1029, 579 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-of-victor-central-school-district-v-victor-teachers-nyappdiv-1991.