Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. Long

268 A.D. 1053, 52 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5465
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Submission of a controversy under sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. The question is whether or not the following clause in a deed creates a condition restricting the use of the land, and for that reason the grantee’s title is unmarketable: “ The said property hereby conveyed being intended for school purposes and being conveyed by said party of the first part upon that understanding ”. The quoted clause is construed as a mere recital of the purpose of the conveyance of the land, and it was not intended and was not sufficient to impose a condition upon the grantee’s estate. Judgment of specific performance is unanimously directed in favor of plaintiff, without costs. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. Long, 268 A.D. 1053, 52 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

268 A.D. 1053 (Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bourque v. City of Yonkers
790 F. Supp. 486 (S.D. New York, 1992)