Board of Education of Triad Community Unit School District No. 2, County of Madison and State of Illinois v. Catlin Indemnity Company
This text of Board of Education of Triad Community Unit School District No. 2, County of Madison and State of Illinois v. Catlin Indemnity Company (Board of Education of Triad Community Unit School District No. 2, County of Madison and State of Illinois v. Catlin Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TRIAD COMMUNITY ) UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2, COUNTY OF ) MADISON AND STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 19-1214 JPG/MAB ) CATLIN INDEMNITY COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
In light of Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals admonitions, see Foster v. Hill, 497
F.3d 695, 696-97 (7th Cir. 2007), the Court has undertaken a rigorous initial review of
pleadings to ensure that jurisdiction has been properly pled. The Court has noted the
following defects in the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint (Doc. 1) filed
by plaintiff Board of Education of Triad Community Unit School District No. 2, County of
Madison and State of Illinois:
• Failure to allege the citizenship of a corporation. A corporation is a citizen of both the state of its principal place of business and the state of its incorporation. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The relevant pleading must affirmatively allege the specific states of incorporation and principal place of business of a corporate party. Dismissal is appropriate if a plaintiff fails to make such allegations. Indiana Hi-Rail Corp. v. Decatur Junction Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 363, 366 n. 3 (7th Cir. 1994). Complaint alleges principal place of business but not state of incorporation of defendant.
The Court hereby ORDERS that Board of Education of Triad Community Unit
School District No. 2, County of Madison and State of Illinois, shall have up to and
including, November 26, 2019 to amend the faulty pleading to correct the jurisdictional
defects. See 28 U.S.C. § 1653. Failure to amend the faulty pleading may result in dismissal of this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Amendment of the faulty pleading to reflect an adequate basis for subject matter jurisdiction will satisfy this order. Plaintiff is directed to consult Local Rule 15.1 regarding amended pleadings and need not seek leave of Court to file such amended pleading.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 12, 2019
s/J. Phil Gilbert U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Board of Education of Triad Community Unit School District No. 2, County of Madison and State of Illinois v. Catlin Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-of-triad-community-unit-school-district-no-2-county-of-ilsd-2019.