Board of Education of Tri-Valley Central School District at Grahamsville v. Celotex Corp.
89 A.D.2d 930, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Board of Education of Tri-Valley Central School District at Grahamsville v. Celotex Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 A.D.2d 713 →
Opinion
Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Did this court err, as a matter of law, in reversing the order of Special Term and denying the motion for summary judgment?” Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Education of Tri-Valley Central School District at Grahamsville v. Celotex Corp., 89 A.D.2d 930, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
89 A.D.2d 930 (Board of Education of Tri-Valley Central School District at Grahamsville v. Celotex Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.