Board of Education of the Union-Endicott Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education of the Union-Endicott Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

250 A.D.2d 996, 672 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5688

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 996 (Board of Education of the Union-Endicott Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education of the Union-Endicott Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 250 A.D.2d 996, 672 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion for permission to appeal to this Court.

Cross motion for an extension of time to perfect the proceeding.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion and the papers filed in response thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied, without costs, as unnecessary. Supreme Court rejected the contention by respondent Public Employment Relations Board that petitioner lacked standing to sue and transferred the proceeding to review the issue of whether the administrative determination being challenged was supported by substantial evidence. The order of transfer brings up for review not only the issue of substantial evidence but also the nonfinal order concluding that petitioner had standing (see, CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Schultz v Roberts, 138 AD2d 980). It is further ordered that the cross motion is granted, without costs, and the time to perfect the proceeding is extended to June 15, 1998.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion for permission to appeal to this Court.

Cross motion for an extension of time to perfect the proceeding.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion and the papers filed in response thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied, without costs, as unnecessary. Supreme Court rejected the contention by respondent Public Employment Relations Board that petitioner lacked standing to sue and transferred the proceeding to review the issue of whether the administrative determination being challenged was supported by substantial evidence. The order of transfer brings up for review not only the issue of substantial evidence but also the nonfinal order concluding that petitioner had standing (see, CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Schultz v Roberts, 138 AD2d 980). It is further ordered that the cross motion is granted, without costs, and the time to perfect the proceeding is extended to June 15, 1998.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 996, 672 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-of-the-union-endicott-central-school-district-v-new-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack