Board of Education of the City School District v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education of the City School District v. State

122 A.D.2d 550, 505 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59821

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1986

DocketClaim No. 67102

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 A.D.2d 550 (Board of Education of the City School District v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education of the City School District v. State, 122 A.D.2d 550, 505 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Claimant appeals from dismissal of its damage claim for appropriation of a temporary easement and demolition of the 99th Street school on the sole ground that the court erred in applying the de jure taking date of March 25, 1980, instead of an alleged de facto taking date of August 2, 1978, the date the New York State Health Commissioner declared a state of emergency at the Love Canal. This contention was raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be considered because the parties stipulated on the record to valuation as of March 25, 1980; that was the date alleged in the Board’s claim, and that was the date utilized by both appraisers (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [3]; Antonetti v City of Syracuse, 52 AD2d 742, 743, lv denied 39 NY2d 711). City of Buffalo v Clement Co. (28 NY2d 241), relied on by claimant, is not on point, since that case involved the issue of condemnation blight, which is not present here. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, Moriarty, J. — appropriation.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Claimant appeals from dismissal of its damage claim for appropriation of a temporary easement and demolition of the 99th Street school on the sole ground that the court erred in applying the de jure taking date of March 25, 1980, instead of an alleged de facto taking date of August 2, 1978, the date the New York State Health Commissioner declared a state of emergency at the Love Canal. This contention was raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be considered because the parties stipulated on the record to valuation as of March 25, 1980; that was the date alleged in the Board’s claim, and that was the date utilized by both appraisers (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [3]; Antonetti v City of Syracuse, 52 AD2d 742, 743, lv denied 39 NY2d 711). City of Buffalo v Clement Co. (28 NY2d 241), relied on by claimant, is not on point, since that case involved the issue of condemnation blight, which is not present here. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, Moriarty, J. — appropriation.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 550, 505 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-of-the-city-school-district-v-state-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack