Board of Education of Ardsley Union Free School District v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education of Ardsley Union Free School District v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers

51 A.D.2d 537, 377 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10767

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an award made in arbitration, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 20, 1974, which denied its application and dismissed the proceeding. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. None of the limited bases upon which a court may vacate an arbitration award (CPLR 7511) are present in the instant case. The clause pursuant to which the parties agreed to arbitrate matters affecting the conditions of a teacher’s employment, i.e., teacher load and class size, does not interfere with the school board’s powers and duties with regard to the operation and management of schools. Petitioner’s argument that no grievance was timely pursued is rejected. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an award made in arbitration, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 20, 1974, which denied its application and dismissed the proceeding. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. None of the limited bases upon which a court may vacate an arbitration award (CPLR 7511) are present in the instant case. The clause pursuant to which the parties agreed to arbitrate matters affecting the conditions of a teacher’s employment, i.e., teacher load and class size, does not interfere with the school board’s powers and duties with regard to the operation and management of schools. Petitioner’s argument that no grievance was timely pursued is rejected. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Board of Education of Ardsley Union Free School District v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers, 51 A.D.2d 537, 377 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 537 (Board of Education of Ardsley Union Free School District v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related