Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson
136 S.E. 722, 193 N.C. 830, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 470
Opinion
Prom an examination of the record we think the statute has been substantially' complied with. We see no reason why the legislative ratification is not substantially sufficient. Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., p. 302; Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough, 187 N. C., p. 77; Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, 189 N. C., at p. 683.
We can find no prejudicial or reversible error. The judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson, 136 S.E. 722, 193 N.C. 830, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 470 (N.C. 1927).
136 S.E. 722 (Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parsley v. County Court of Raleigh County
167 S.E. 738 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1933)