Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp. v. Platt

135 A.D.3d 533, 22 N.Y.S.3d 843
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp. v. Platt. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.3d 645
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 2016·No. 16657 155985/14·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered May 5, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for leave to renew her motion to dismiss the claim for consequential damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The new facts offered by defendant on her renewal motion would not change the prior determination (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). The mere fact that the plaintiff in a related federal action chose not to depose defendant does not support defendant’s theory that her disclosure of attorney-client communications will not play a role in the determination of that action or a state action brought by the same plaintiff. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp. v. Platt, 135 A.D.3d 533, 22 N.Y.S.3d 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 533 (Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp. v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.