Board of County Commissioners v. People Ex Rel. McPherson

91 P. 36, 36 Colo. 246
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 8, 1906
Docket5040; 2603 C. A.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 P. 36 (Board of County Commissioners v. People Ex Rel. McPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of County Commissioners v. People Ex Rel. McPherson, 91 P. 36, 36 Colo. 246 (Colo. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Department.3:

A complaint was filed in the district court of Las Animas county reciting that a petition was filed with the board of county commissioners of said county praying for the establishment of an election precinct at Primero in said county, but that the county commissioners had refused to act; and praying for a writ of mandamus .commanding the commissioners to establish an election precinct at said Primero. A demurrer to the complaint was filed, and was overruled, and judgment entered granting the writ. The board of commissioners-took the case to. the court of appeals by writ of error.

*247 We shall take judicial notice of the fact that there has been a precinct established at Primero in said county. It is not material whether the precinct was established upon proper petition or by virtue of authority so to do under the statute.

There being no live question for us to determine, ^the cause should be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Cardwell
242 P. 977 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1926)
State ex rel. Gregory v. Boyd
87 N.E. 140 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 P. 36, 36 Colo. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-county-commissioners-v-people-ex-rel-mcpherson-colo-1906.